Reader Q&A

 

Q: I am confused by all the claims of doctors and the diet industry. Does eating fat make you fat? And does saturated fat really cause heart disease?

 

A: The simple answer to both those questions is, “No.” However, modern ranching and feed-lot practices make the fat of animals raised in those conditions unfit for human consumption. 99% of all animals intended for slaughter are fed a diet of corn. Corn makes the animals fatter, bringing a better price for the grower (cattle are sold by on-the-hoof weight, not the quality of the meat). All corn acquires various molds during storage and shipment, therefore all corn contains numerous mycotoxins, the most harmful being aflatoxin B1. The animal’s body tries to quarantine these mycotoxins by enclosing them in fat cells for later elimination. The more mycotoxins that are consumed, the more fat cells are produced in an attempt to isolate the toxins, thus making fatter animals at slaughter time. Aflatoxin cannot be destroyed by temperature extremes - freezing and cooking have no effect (it has been suggested that a temperature high enough to destabilize mycotoxins – make them inert – would make your steak nothing more than charcoal) The legal limit of allowable aflatoxin for human consumption is 20 parts per billion (ppb), but 300 ppb are allowed in animals that are intended for human consumption.

 

So when we eat the animal fat, we’re getting a massive dose of aflatoxin, which our bodies try to isolate by making new fat cells. Over time, these toxins make their way into the bloodstream. The blood’s way of trying to neutralize them is to encase them in something called “plaque,” which then accumulates on the walls of veins and arteries. When it builds up enough, the result is heart disease or heart attack.

 

The animal fats you eat do not make you fat (exception: see the sugar section of the response to the next question) or give you heart disease. The mycotoxins in that fat are what is hurting people. To avoid the problem of mycotoxins in your meat, always choose grass-fed meats whenever possible. A lot of people don’t like the taste or appearance of grass-fed beef, because the fat is yellow in color and the taste is described as “gamy.” I’ve had grass-fed beef and I don’t think it tastes gamy at all. I think it tastes like beef, not the bland, dyed, who-knows-how-old-it-is meat you find neatly wrapped in plastic at the grocery store. It also might not be that bright red color you’re accustomed to, because most people who process grass-fed meat do not use nitrates to preserve the red color (without the added chemicals in grocery store meats, it would all be brownish and you wouldn’t buy it). The yellow fat in grass-fed meat is yellow because of beta-carotene and conjugated linoleic acid, both of which are very good for you. See http://www.mercola.com/beef/cla.htm for more information on CLA and its health benefits.

 

Don’t be fooled into buying “organic” or “free range” meat. Neither one of those marketing phrases is an indicator that the animal really ate any grass at all. “Organic” simply means they were fed an organic diet, most probably organic corn (which, because it’s organic will be teeming with Aspergillus and other forms of mold), and “free range” just means an animal has access to the outdoors, but it might only be five minutes a day in a tiny corral barely big enough to turn around in (many confining feed lots qualify to use the phrase “free range”). There are many ways to stretch the truth in advertising (usually by changing the definition of words). “Free range poultry” just means the chickens have more than two square feet of floor space per bird. They might never have seen the sky in their entire lives. So be a smart shopper. Read the labels, ask questions, and when in doubt, leave it on the store shelf.

 

Q. You guys talk a lot about toxins and things that screw up my immune system functions. Can you elaborate a bit?

 

A: Sure. Here’s a list of some of the most common immune system toxins.

 

Nitrates

 

Nitrates are primarily found in meats and are converted to nitrosamines in the body. Nitrosamines aid in the creation of cancer, heart disease, behavioral disorders, and if heavily consumed, can cause heart attacks. They also depress immune function, leading to more frequent and severe infections.

 

Found in:          Ham

                        Bacon

                        Sausage

                        Bologna

                        Hot dogs

                        Pastrami

                        Salami

                        Pepperoni

                        Red meats

 

Hydrogenated Oils

 

Hydrogenated oils interfere with the cell membranes, making them less fluid. White blood cells are then unable to function to destroy and consume foreign microbes, leading to deep-seated systemic infections.

 

Found in:          Doughnuts, pastries, cakes, cookies, pies, etc.

                        Granola bars

                        Waffles, Pop-Tarts

                        Microwave popcorn

                        Peanut butter

                        French fries, Tater Tots, hash browns

                        Battered or breaded food

                        All chips (potato, corn, tortilla)

                        Commercial bread, buns, bagels

                        Creamed soups or vegetables

                        TV dinners or entrees

                        Breakfast cereals

 

Refined Vegetable Oils

 

When heated, these oils behave basically the same as hydrogenated oils by interfering with cell membrane function, leading to immune system malfunction. The toxins formed by these oils when heated are also very carcinogenic. Deep fried foods contribute greatly to the creation of cancer.

 

Found in:          Corn oil

                        Safflower oil

                        Sunflower oil

                        Peanut oil

                        Canola oil

                        Soybean oil

 

Olive oil, grapeseed oil, and coconut oil, however, are beneficial to your immune system and have antimicrobial properties as well. Olive and grapeseed oil can be slightly heated with no toxic by-products, but it’s best to use them unheated. Coconut oil can be heated to fairly high temperatures with no toxic effects. Use olive or grapeseed oils in your salad dressings and sauces, and use coconut oil for cooking.

 

Refined Sugar

 

Sugar consumption causes Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, blood clots, high blood pressure, and heart attacks, not to mention obesity. It is also believed that sugar causes cancer, because cancer patients who eliminate all sugar from their diets go into “remission.” The tumors need sugar to live, and without it they will starve and die. (This is why I think cancer is actually a fungal infection.)

 

A hundred years ago, the per capita consumption of sugar in this country was close to zero (an average of less than five pounds per person per year) Today it’s more than 150 pounds per person per year. That’s an average of 12.5 pounds of sugar consumed by every person in this country every single month. Before you say “But I don’t eat that much sugar!” go read the labels on everything you eat on a daily basis. That’s where all the sugar is hiding and you are not even conscious that you’re eating it!

 

Sugar has zero nutritional value, and it actually depletes certain nutrients in the body, specifically:

 

                        Chromium

                        Magnesium

                        Zinc

                        Copper

                        Potassium

                        Thiamin

                        Niacin

                        Pantothenic acid

                        Folic acid

                        Biotin

 

As well as depleting these nutrients, sugar also promotes fungal growth in the body, and kills white blood cells in the process.

 

Eating sugar with fat is especially devastating. This includes pastries, cakes, cookies, chocolate bars, etc. Also, eating anything with fat along with a soda pop (i.e., fast food fare) has the same effect. The reason is that consuming sugar causes the pancreas to produce insulin to process the sugar and store it in the muscles where it can be used as energy. Insulin also signals the body to store any fat consumed, saving it for use later. This is because sugar consumption (in large quantities, as every American eats today) is a fairly new trend (within the last 100 years or so), and our bodies are programmed to always store energy for later, when we might not have foraged enough food, or the hunt was unsuccessful. This is a self-protective mechanism to avoid starvation. Now, though, when we eat sugar, we’re getting energy, so the body says “OK, we’ve got the sugar for energy, now what to do with all that fat? Let’s store it in case there’s no food next week!” The results in today’s society are disastrous – an epidemic of obesity. If you consume no sugar, the body utilizes the fat you do eat right away, and there’s no weight gain (provided there’s at least some physical exercise involved).

 

The sugar/fat problem is exacerbated in people with Insulin Resistance (i.e. Type 2 diabetics), whose bodies produce many times the normal amount of insulin. The more insulin produced, the more fat is stored. The increased amount of insulin makes it seem like a huge amount of sugar was consumed.

 

I kind of wandered off track there, but the connection between sugar and fat is important, and anyone with excess pounds to shed should be aware of the relationship between the two.

 

Found in:          Practically all processed food

 

Iron

 

The type of iron used by food manufacturers is inorganic iron, because it is far less expensive to produce than organic iron. It is made by dissolving iron metal. This kind of “iron fortification” does little more than add to your heavy metal burden, contaminating internal organs, especially the liver, whose job it is to extract and excrete these contaminants.

 

Found in:          Commercial white flour products

                        Breakfast cereals

                        Anything that says “Iron Fortified”

 

Organic iron (found in plant and animal sources) is non-toxic to the body and is fully absorbable. By “organic” I mean that it has been partially processed by the plants, so it’s “predigested” for lack of a better description. Good sources of high-quality organic iron are found in the following foods:

 

                        Red meat (nitrate-free) from plant-eating animals only

                        Dark leafy greens

                        Grapes, prunes (or dark plums)

                        Some herbs (oregano, parsley, cumin)

                        Sardines

                        Egg yolks

 

White Flour Products

 

All white flour products are made with flour that has had every shred of nutritional value removed from it. It is then “fortified” with synthetic iron and vitamins. If you’re going to use flour, always choose whole wheat flour that has not had the bran and germ removed. Home ground flour is obviously the best choice.

 

Artificial Favors and Colors

 

Most of these are made from coal tar or petroleum residues. Most are also known carcinogens. Despite thorough research in the 1920s, the government decided in favor of the big chemical corporations, and approved these substances as food additives. The “logic” behind this decision was that they would be consumed only in small amounts, and therefore pose no hazard, however, today almost all processed foods contain these artificial flavors and colors. Heavy consumption of these additives can actually kill white blood cells outright. All the FD&C dyes are derived from coal tar and should never be consumed.

 

Alcohol

 

Alcohol depletes many nutrients (besides being itself a mycotoxic substance), including:

 

                        All the B vitamins

                        Vitamin C

                        Vitamin A

                        Essential fatty acids

                        Amino acids

                        Zinc

                        Selenium

                        Magnesium

 

Alcohol also denudes the mucous membranes, leaving the tissue open to infection.

 

Vaccines

 

Vaccines are harmful in many ways. They are always contaminated, for one thing. There’s no way to filter out only the virus or other microorganism that is desired. Often they are contaminated with an animal virus from the animal tissue or serum they were cultured in. Most also contain other contaminants, including bacteria and mold, from the surrounding atmosphere. All vaccines contain mercury as a preservative. The so-called “mercury-free” vaccines are not actually without mercury. The FDA simply redefined the word to mean the mercury content is below a certain level (like the “fat-free” cookies that each contain 0.5 grams of fat). And don’t you believe the doctor when he tells you the vaccine he’s injecting into your body contains only a dead virus. If it was dead, your immune system wouldn’t need to react by producing antibodies to it.

 

Vaccines only work part of the time. An effective vaccine must contain the exact strain of live virus that you’re trying to immunize against. Viruses are constantly mutating, making most vaccines ineffective before they’re available. Then there’s human error. In 2004, the flu vaccine cultured for that year was the wrong strain. It did absolutely nothing to prevent the current strain of flu, yet even though this was known by the CDC, the AMA, and most doctors, people were still encouraged to go get their flu shot that year, even though it was of no use. Why? Because the vaccine cost $8.00 per dose to produce, and they wanted their money. I don’t know how many people got a flu shot that year, or how much they paid if they did get one, but I’d be willing to bet it was a tad bit more than $8.00 per shot. Which means that Big Pharma not only got their money back, but they made a profit on nothing more than a huge mistake!

 

Remember, it’s not about your health any more; it’s about bottom-line profits.

 

Watchdog

 

1. University of Cincinnati (UC) researchers say exposure to a certain group of fungal spores—abundant in the air that we breathe every day—can make young children more susceptible to developing multiple allergies later in life. And it goes way beyond that statement. For more, see: http://www.uc.edu/news/NR.asp?id=4085 and on the same subject: Indoor air quality has become increasingly important as we live in a society where the majority of our time is spent indoors. Specific attention has been drawn to airborne fungal spores as a factor affecting indoor air quality. This study targeted shortcomings of other studies by utilizing long-term air sampling and total fungal spore enumeration to determine associations between health outcomes and fungal spore concentrations. See: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00414.x The point here, even though neither of these articles goes far enough, is that mainstream folks are starting to recognize the fungal problem.

 

2. You won’t believe today’s news unless you actually read it. In an unprecedented power grab, the FDA has declared that all drug companies are now immune to lawsuits on any drug that has been granted FDA approval. It’s the biggest handout to drug companies ever, and the action further establishes the FDA as a rogue agency acting to protect Big Pharma, with no respect for the laws of the land or the safety of health consumers. Read the full, astonishing story at: http://www.newstarget.com/019497.html

 

3. Big Brother is closing in on your freedom of choice: An influential government advisory panel recommended that 11- and 12-year-old girls be routinely vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer. More at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13612899/

 

4. New evidence showing that beta blocker drugs increase patients’ risk of strokes, heart attacks and diabetes has led to 2 million Britons being taken off the blood-pressure drugs. More at: http://www.newstarget.com/019493.html

 

5. At a time when many are calling for more risk information in direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical ads, a new study from AstraZeneca puts a cap on the number of risks mentioned in TV spots before the consumer is overloaded. http://www.bioethics.net/News/?id=2266 Trust the drug makers to want to limit what they have to tell you about how sick their drug might make you.

 

6. Increasingly, patients are being treated by health care professionals with N.P. after their name instead of M.D. or D.O. Nurse-managed primary care centers such as Project Salud have increased to about 250 nationwide today, from a small handful 15 years ago. Full story at:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/25/AR2006062500282.html I’d like to insert my plug for NPs (nurse-practitioners) and CNPs (certified nurse-practitioners) here. I find that, as a generalization, CNPs offer more personalized care than do MDs. This is purely empirical on my part, with no official studies to back me up. I find MDs to be too bigheaded/egocentric. The CNP I visit regularly (2-4 times per year) appears to actually care about me and is willing to take the time to listen carefully to what I have to say about whatever brought me to her office. All the MDs I have known, on the other hand, appear to want nothing more than to prescribe a pill and get me out of the office (there are, of course, exceptions: I know one CNP who believes she is an MD and has the appropriate attitude). I have found very few MDs during my life who will even take the time to listen to my theory of what caused the ailment or what might be preventing the body from squelching that ailment. I know many of you will be thinking that this would be natural, given that I currently qualify as a quack with unorthodox theories (at least far from mainstream), however you should also note that my current beliefs in health care have only been around for about a year, yet my statements above span my entire life. Anyway, unless you need a “specialist,” when in the market for a general practitioner, if you have the choice between a CNP or an MD, take the nurse!

 

7. Drug companies are accused today of endangering public health through wide-scale marketing malpractices, ranging from covertly attempting to persuade consumers that they are ill to bribing doctors and misrepresenting the results of safety and efficacy tests on their products. More at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,1806084,00.html

 

8. A 15-month inquiry by a top House Democrat has found that enforcement of the nation’s food and drug laws declined sharply during the first five years of the Bush administration. For instance, the investigation found, the number of warning letters that the Food and Drug Administration issued to drug companies, medical device makers and others dropped 54 percent, to 535 in 2005 from 1,154 in 2000. Get the full version at: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/27/health/policy/27fda.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

 

9. Supermarkets must not be allowed to set up walk-in clinics on their premises because a GP’s advice to patients would be undermined by the cigarettes, alcohol and junk food on sale, doctors said yesterday. http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,1807341,00.html Somehow I seriously doubt that is the real reason. This article comes from England, where most doctors get a salary from the government (socialized medicine) rather than a fee-structure to the patients. However, even in the UK, there are few doctors who will tell you not to eat whatever food is on sale. They still do, like here in the USA, get kickbacks for prescribing certain medications, and I know of no prescription medication that is ever “on sale” (with the exception of DTC introductory price breaks to get you hooked in the first place). I suspect that this is more of an attempt to require patients to go through the normal system, thereby ensuring that the existing doctors get their chance at the kickbacks.

 

10. Critics say the payments can bias the doctors’ treatment decisions and may lead to suspect research findings. http://www.bioethics.net/News/?id=2277 I don’t think one need be a “critic” to come to that conclusion. He who is being paid to prescribe a medicine is always more likely to prescribe the one that fattens his wallet.

 

11. A drug that can restore eyesight to some elderly people, even allowing them to read or drive again, is expected to win federal approval this week. But for patients, doctors, Medicare and other insurers, the drug’s arrival will pose a conundrum. That is because the medicine, Lucentis, is expected to be 10 to 100 times as expensive as a similar drug that many ophthalmologists say is every bit as good. More at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/29/business/29eye.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

 

12. Big Brother is at it again, this time to protect the surgeon’s income. A 34-year-old mother in Seattle has been arrested, jailed and charged with “kidnapping” her own infant son after she tried to rescue him from overzealous surgeons who demanded to perform kidney surgery on the boy. “You do what I tell you to do, or I will have the police at the door, taking that baby from you.” That’s what one doctor reportedly told the woman, shortly before Child Protective Services took her baby away. More at: http://www.newstarget.com/019512.html The child was not in imminent danger as the Amber Alert claimed.

 

13. Healthy adults taking maximum doses of Tylenol for two weeks had abnormal liver test results in a small study, researchers found, raising concerns that even recommended amounts of the popular painkiller might lead to liver damage. In the study, 106 participants took four grams of Tylenol — equivalent to eight extra-strength Tylenol tablets — each day for two weeks. Some took Tylenol alone and some took it with an opioid painkiller. Dummy pills were given to 39 others. More at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13702968/ It’s a good thing this was dated 7/04/06 or I would call it an April Fool’s joke. Now I have to ask, where the hell have these people had their heads buried? I’m sorry, but all you have to do is look at the PDR (physician’s desk reference) to see the possible negative effects of acetaminophen to know what this expensive study is just now telling us. For example:

                                                         

Do not take these products for more than 10 days for pain (5-day limit for children) or 3 days for fever without your doctor's approval. Stop taking this medication and check with your doctor if your pain or fever won't go away or gets worse, or if you develop new symptoms or notice any redness or swelling. When using acetaminophen to treat sore throat, stop and check with your doctor if the sore throat is severe, lasts more than 2 days, or is linked with a fever, headache, rash, nausea, or vomiting. If you develop an allergic reaction, stop taking this medication. If your child must avoid phenylalanine, do not give the children's or junior strength chewable tablets. Possible food and drug interactions when taking this medication Do not use these products if you are taking other medications containing acetaminophen. Check with your doctor before combining acetaminophen with [any one or more of] the following:


The cholesterol-lowering drug cholestyramine (Questran)

The TB medication isoniazid (Nydrazid)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as Advil and Dolobid

Oral contraceptives

The anti-seizure drug phenytoin (Dilantin)

The blood-thinning medication warfarin (Coumadin)

The HIV drug zidovudine (Retrovir)

 

Combined with heavy drinking, acetaminophen could conceivably cause liver damage. Check with your doctor about taking this medication if you generally have three or more alcoholic beverages a day.

Return to Index